University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

A defence of constructionism: philosophy as conceptual engineering

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • L. Floridi
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-304
JournalMetaphilosophy
Volume42
Issue3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Abstract

This article offers an account and defence of constructionism, both as a metaphilosophical approach and as a philosophical methodology, with references to the so-called maker's knowledge tradition. Its main thesis is that Plato's "user's knowledge" tradition should be complemented, if not replaced, by a constructionist approach to philosophical problems in general and to knowledge in particular. Epistemic agents know something when they are able to build (reproduce, simulate, model, construct, etc.) that something and plug the obtained information into the correct network of relations that account for it. Their epistemic expertise increases with the scope and depth of the questions that they are able to ask and answer. Thus, constructionism deprioritises mimetic, passive, and declarative knowledge that something is the case, in favour of poietic, interactive, and practical knowledge of something being the case. Metaphilosophically, constructionism suggests adding conceptual engineering to conceptual analysis as a fundamental method.

Notes

The definitive version can be found at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ Copyright Wiley-Blackwell [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]

ID: 183287