University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

Average Scores Integration in Official Star Rating Scheme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Documents

  • PDF_Proof

    Accepted author manuscript, 371 KB, PDF-document

View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology
Journal publication date6 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jun 2019

Abstract

Purpose of this paper: Evidence suggests that Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) plays a highly influential role in decision-making when booking hotel rooms. The number of online sources where consumers can obtain information on hotel ratings provided has grown exponentially. Hence, a number of companies have developed Average Scores to summarise this information and to make it more easily available to consumers. Furthermore, Official Star Rating schemes are starting to provide these commercially developed Average Scores to complement the information their schemes offer. This raises questions regarding the robustness of these systems, which this paper addresses.
Design/methodology/approach: Average Scores from different systems, as well as the scores provided by one rating site were collected for 200 hotels and compared.
Findings: Findings suggested important differences in the ratings and assigned descriptive word across websites.
Research limitations/implications (if applicable): The results imply that the application of Average Scores by Official organisations is not legitimate and identifies a research gap in the area of consumer and star rating standardization.
What is original/value of paper: The paper is of value to the industry and academia related to the examination of rating scales adopted by major online review tourism providers. Evidence of malpractice has been identified and the adoption of this type of scales by Official Star Rating schemes is questioned.

ID: 13314078