University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

  • Katie Newby
  • Grace Teah
  • Richard Cooke
  • Xinru Li
  • Katherine Brown
  • Bradley Salisbury-Finch
  • Kayleigh Kwah
  • Naomi Bartle
  • Kristina Curtis
  • Emmie Fulton
  • Joanne Parsons
  • Elise Dusseldorp
  • Stefanie Williams
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
JournalHealth Psychology Review
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 13 Dec 2019

Abstract

Self-efficacy is an important determinant of health behaviour. Digital interventions are a potentially acceptable and cost-effective way of delivering programmes of health behaviour change at scale. Whether behaviour change interventions work to increase self-efficacy in this context is unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to identify whether automated digital interventions are associated with positive changes in self-efficacy amongst non-clinical populations for five major health behaviours, and which BCTs are associated with that change. A systematic literature search identified 20 studies (n=5624) that assessed changes in self-efficacy and were included in a random effects meta-analysis. Interventions targeted: healthy eating (k=4), physical activity (k=9), sexual behaviour (k=3), and smoking (k=4). No interventions targeting alcohol use were identified. Overall, interventions had a small, positive effect on self-efficacy (푔 = 0.190, CI [0.078; 0.303]). The effect of interventions on self-efficacy did not differ as a function of health behaviour type (Qbetween = 7.3704 p = 0.061, df = 3). Inclusion of the BCT ‘information about social and environmental consequences’ had a small, negative effect on self-efficacy (Δ푔= - 0.297, Q=7.072, p=0.008). Whilst this review indicates that digital interventions can be used to change self-efficacy, which techniques work best in this context is not clear.

ID: 18128950