University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

From Euclidean Geometry to Knots and Nets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Documents

Links

View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Article number10.1007/s11229-017-1558-x
Number of pages22
Pages (from-to)2715-2736
JournalSynthese
Journal publication date15 Jul 2019
Volume196
Issue7
Early online date19 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2019

Abstract

This paper assumes the success of arguments against the view that informal mathematical proofs secure rational conviction in virtue of their relations with corresponding formal derivations. This assumption entails a need for an alternative account of the logic of informal mathematical proofs. Following examination of case studies by Manders, De Toffoli and Giardino, Leitgeb, Feferman and others, this paper proposes a framework for analysing those informal proofs that appeal to the perception or modification of diagrams or to the inspection or imaginative manipulation of mental models of mathematical phenomena. Proofs relying on diagrams can be rigorous if (a) it is easy to draw a diagram that shares or otherwise indicates the structure of the mathematical object, (b) the information thus displayed is not metrical and (c) it is possible to put the inferences into systematic mathematical relation with other mathematical inferential practices. Proofs that appeal to mental models can be rigorous if the mental models can be externalised as diagrammatic practice that satisfies these three conditions.

Notes

This document is the Accepted Manuscript of an article accepted for publication in Synthese. Under embargo until 19 September 2018. The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1558-x.

Projects

ID: 10719061