University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

Documents

  • Claire Goodman
  • Rachael Frost
  • Celia Belk
  • Ana Jovicic
  • Federico Ricciardi
  • Benhamin Gardner
  • Steve Iliffe
  • Jill Manthorpe
  • Vari Drennan
  • Kate Walters
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
JournalBMC Geriatrics
Journal publication date20 Jul 2017
Volume17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jul 2017

Abstract

Abstract
Background: Mild or pre-frailty is common and associated with increased risks of hospitalisation, functional decline, moves to long-term care, and death. Little is known about the effectiveness of health promotion in reducing these risks. This systematic review aimed to synthesise randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating home and community-based health promotion interventions for older people with mild/pre-frailty.
Methods: We searched 20 bibliographic databases and 3 trials registers (January 1990 – May 2016) using mild/pre-frailty and associated terms. We included randomised controlled and crossover trials of health promotion interventions for community-dwelling older people (65+ years) with mild/pre-frailty and excluded studies focussing on populations in hospital, long term care facilities or with a specific condition. Risk of bias was assessed by two reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We pooled study results using standardised mean differences (SMD) where possible and used narrative synthesis where insufficient outcome data were available.
Results: We included 10 articles reporting on seven trials (total n=506 participants) and included five trials in a meta-analysis. Studies were predominantly small, of limited quality and six studies tested group exercise alone. One study additionally investigated a nutrition and exercise intervention and one evaluated telemonitoring. Interventions of exercise in groups showed mixed effects on functioning (no effects on self-reported functioning SMD 0.19 (95% CI -0.57 to 0.95) n=3 studies; positive effects on performance-based functioning SMD 0.37 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.68) n=3 studies). No studies assessed moves to long-term care or hospitalisations.
Conclusions: Currently the evidence base is of insufficient size, quality and breadth to recommend specific health promotion interventions for older people with mild or pre- frailty. High quality studies of rigorously developed interventions are needed.
PROSPERO registration: CRD42014010370 (Review 2)

Notes

© The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

ID: 12137938