University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

From the same journal

  • Sue Halliday
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages9
Pages (from-to)354-362
JournalMarketing Intelligence and Planning
Journal publication date1999
Volume17
Issue7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Abstract

Questions the processes and methodologies of marketing research. Challenges the “scientific” hypothetico-deductive approach and asserts that interpretative and qualitative methods provide a more worthwhile framework for research. Explores frames of reference for assessing qualitative marketing scholarship and research. Discusses the implications of adapting frameworks from the world of art. Concludes by stressing that marketing research needs to be accepted at different levels of focus; hard work is required to create resonance; and persuasiveness and illumination should be of supreme importance in the research design and data analysis.

Notes

Original article can be found at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ Copyright Emerald [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]

ID: 432359