University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{6b798fd3a4f548eb9ba9a5666b91f053,
title = "Kierkegaard and the problem of special relationships: Ferreira, Krishek and the 'God filter'",
abstract = "Kierkegaard’s Works of Love has often been accused of being unable todeal adequately with ‘special relationships’. This debate has re-emerged in a fresh form in a recent disagreement in the secondary literature between M. Jamie Ferreira and Sharon Krishek. Krishek charges Ferreira with failing to acknowledge some important conflicts in Kierkegaard’s account of preferential love. In this article, I argue that some key passages are indeed insufficiently addressed in Ferreira’s account. Yet ultimately, I argue, Krishek ends up condemning the Kierkegaard of Works of Love unfairly. As a solution to Krishek’s concerns, I present a defence of Kierkegaard’s position centred round the image of God as a ‘filter’ through which our loves must pass. Also, while acknowledging that Krishek raises some important questions for Ferreira’s account, I outline a possible response, based in part on Kierkegaard’s idea that neighbour love isonly a ‘sketch’ until brought to fruition in any given manifestation of concrete love. Ultimately, I claim, Kierkegaard’s position in Works of Love can indeed be defended from Krishek’s critique.",
keywords = "God · Kierkegaard · Neighbour-love · Preferential love · Self-love",
author = "John Lippitt",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s11153-012-9364-3",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "177--197",
journal = "International Journal for Philosophy of Religion",
issn = "0020-7047",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kierkegaard and the problem of special relationships

T2 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

AU - Lippitt, John

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Kierkegaard’s Works of Love has often been accused of being unable todeal adequately with ‘special relationships’. This debate has re-emerged in a fresh form in a recent disagreement in the secondary literature between M. Jamie Ferreira and Sharon Krishek. Krishek charges Ferreira with failing to acknowledge some important conflicts in Kierkegaard’s account of preferential love. In this article, I argue that some key passages are indeed insufficiently addressed in Ferreira’s account. Yet ultimately, I argue, Krishek ends up condemning the Kierkegaard of Works of Love unfairly. As a solution to Krishek’s concerns, I present a defence of Kierkegaard’s position centred round the image of God as a ‘filter’ through which our loves must pass. Also, while acknowledging that Krishek raises some important questions for Ferreira’s account, I outline a possible response, based in part on Kierkegaard’s idea that neighbour love isonly a ‘sketch’ until brought to fruition in any given manifestation of concrete love. Ultimately, I claim, Kierkegaard’s position in Works of Love can indeed be defended from Krishek’s critique.

AB - Kierkegaard’s Works of Love has often been accused of being unable todeal adequately with ‘special relationships’. This debate has re-emerged in a fresh form in a recent disagreement in the secondary literature between M. Jamie Ferreira and Sharon Krishek. Krishek charges Ferreira with failing to acknowledge some important conflicts in Kierkegaard’s account of preferential love. In this article, I argue that some key passages are indeed insufficiently addressed in Ferreira’s account. Yet ultimately, I argue, Krishek ends up condemning the Kierkegaard of Works of Love unfairly. As a solution to Krishek’s concerns, I present a defence of Kierkegaard’s position centred round the image of God as a ‘filter’ through which our loves must pass. Also, while acknowledging that Krishek raises some important questions for Ferreira’s account, I outline a possible response, based in part on Kierkegaard’s idea that neighbour love isonly a ‘sketch’ until brought to fruition in any given manifestation of concrete love. Ultimately, I claim, Kierkegaard’s position in Works of Love can indeed be defended from Krishek’s critique.

KW - God · Kierkegaard · Neighbour-love · Preferential love · Self-love

U2 - 10.1007/s11153-012-9364-3

DO - 10.1007/s11153-012-9364-3

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 177

EP - 197

JO - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

JF - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

SN - 0020-7047

IS - 3

ER -