University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

Documents

  • S. Amaducci
  • L. Cosentino
  • M. Barbagallo
  • N. Colonna
  • A. Mengoni
  • C. Massimi
  • S. Lo Meo
  • P. Finocchiaro
  • O. Aberle
  • J. Andrzejewski
  • L. Audouin
  • M. Bacak
  • J. Balibrea
  • F. Bečvář
  • E. Berthoumieux
  • J. Billowes
  • D. Bosnar
  • A. Brown
  • M. Caamaño
  • F. Calviño
  • M. Calviani
  • D. Cano-Ott
  • R. Cardella
  • A. Casanovas
  • F. Cerutti
  • E. Chiaveri
  • G. Cortés
  • M. A. Cortés-Giraldo
  • L. A. Damone
  • M. Diakaki
  • C. Domingo-Pardo
  • R. Dressler
  • E. Dupont
  • I. Durán
  • B. Fernández-Domínguez
  • A. Ferrari
  • P. Ferreira
  • V. Furman
  • K. Göbel
  • A. R. García
  • A. Gawlik
  • S. Gilardoni
  • T. Glodariu
  • I. F. Gonçalves
  • E. González-Romero
  • E. Griesmayer
  • C. Guerrero
  • F. Gunsing
  • H. Harada
  • S. Heinitz
  • J. Heyse
  • D. G. Jenkins
  • E. Jericha
  • F. Käppeler
  • Y. Kadi
  • A. Kalamara
  • P. Kavrigin
  • A. Kimura
  • N. Kivel
  • I. Knapova
  • M. Kokkoris
  • M. Krtička
  • D. Kurtulgil
  • E. Leal-Cidoncha
  • C. Lederer
  • H. Leeb
  • J. Lerendegui-Marco
  • S. J. Lonsdale
  • D. Macina
  • A. Manna
  • J. Marganiec
  • T. Martínez
  • A. Masi
  • P. Mastinu
  • M. Mastromarco
  • E. A. Maugeri
  • A. Mazzone
  • E. Mendoza
  • P. M. Milazzo
  • F. Mingrone
  • A. Musumarra
  • A. Negret
  • R. Nolte
  • A. Oprea
  • N. Patronis
  • A. Pavlik
  • J. Perkowski
  • I. Porras
  • J. Praena
  • J. M. Quesada
  • D. Radeck
  • R. Reifarth
  • C. Rubbia
  • J. A. Ryan
  • M. Sabaté-Gilarte
  • A. Saxena
  • P. Schillebeeckx
  • D. Schumann
  • P. Sedyshev
  • A. G. Smith
  • N. V. Sosnin
  • A. Stamatopoulos
  • G. Tagliente
  • J. L. Tain
  • A. Tarifeño-Saldivia
  • L. Tassan-Got
  • S. Valenta
  • G. Vannini
  • V. Variale
  • P. Vaz
  • A. Ventura
  • V. Vlachoudis
  • R. Vlastou
  • A. Wallner
  • S. Warren
  • C. Weiss
  • T. Wright
  • P. Žugec
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Article number120
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Physical Journal A
Journal publication date1 Jul 2019
Volume55
Issue7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Abstract

The 235U(n, f) cross section was measured at n_TOF relative to 6Li(n, t) and 10B(n,α) , with high resolution (L= 183. 49 (2) m) and in a wide energy range (25meV-170keV) with 1.5% systematic uncertainty, making use of a stack of six samples and six silicon detectors placed in the neutron beam. This allowed us to make a direct comparison of the yields of the 235U(n, f) and of the two reference reactions under the same experimental conditions, and taking into account the forward/backward emission asymmetry. A hint of an anomaly in the 10-30keV neutron energy range had been previously observed in other experiments, indicating a cross section systematically lower by several percent relative to major evaluations. The present results indicate that the cross section in the 9-18keV neutron energy range is indeed overestimated by almost 5% in the recently released evaluated data files ENDF/B-VIII.0 and JEFF3.3, as a consequence of a 7% overestimate in a single GMA node in the IAEA reference file. Furthermore, these new high-resolution data confirm the existence of resonance-like structures in the keV neutron energy region. The results here reported may lead to a reduction of the uncertainty in the 1-100keV neutron energy region. Finally, from the present data, a value of 249. 7 ± 1. 4 (stat) ± 0. 94 (syst) b·eV has been extracted for the cross section integral between 7.8 and 11eV, confirming the value of 247. 5 ± 3 b·eV recently established as a standard.

ID: 17211866