University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
JournalEconomic History Review
Journal publication date27 Jul 2017
Early online date27 Jul 2017
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 27 Jul 2017

Abstract

Using a substantial set of vagrancy removal records for Middlesex (1777-86) giving details of the place of origin of some 11,500 individuals, and analysing these records using a five variable gravity model of migration, this article addresses a simple question: from which parts of England did London draw its lower class migrants in the late eighteenth century? It concludes, first, that industrializing areas of the North emerged as a competitor for potential migrants – contributing relatively fewer migrants than predicted by the model. Rising wage rates in these areas appear to explain this phenomenon. Second, it argues that migration from urban centres in the West Midlands and parts of the West Country, including Bristol, Birmingham, and Worcester was substantially higher than predicted, and that this is largely explained by falling wage rates and the
evolution of an increasingly efficient travel network. And third, that for the
counties within about 130 kilometers of the capital, this article suggests that migration followed the pattern described in the current literature, with
London drawing large numbers of local women in particular. It also argues
that these short-distance migrants came from a uniquely wide number of parishes, suggesting a direct rural-to-urban path.

Notes

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Adam Crymble, Adam Dennett, and Tim Hitchock, 'Modelling regional imbalances in English plebeian migration to late eighteenth-century London', The Economic History Review, doi:10.1111/ehr.12569, first published 27 July 2017. This article may be used for non-commercial purposed in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. © Economic History Society 2017.

ID: 11225597