University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychological Medicine
Journal publication date22 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jul 2019

Abstract

Background. The present paper provides an updated review of both the large number of new/ novel/emerging psychoactive substances (NPS) and their associated psychopathological consequences. Focus was here given on identification of those NPS being commented in specialised online sources and the related short-/long-term psychopathological and medical ill-health effects. Methods. NPS have been identified through an innovative crawling/navigating software, called the ‘NPS.Finder®’, created in order to facilitate the process of early recognition of NPS online. A range of information regarding NPS, including chemical and street names; chemical formula; three-dimensional image and anecdotally reported clinical/psychoactive effects, were here made available. Results. Using the ‘NPS.Finder®’ approach, a few thousand NPS were here preliminarily identified, a number which is about 4-fold higher than those figures suggested by European and international drug agencies. NPS most commonly associated with the onset of psychopathological consequences included here synthetic cannabinoids/cannabimimetics; new synthetic opioids; ketamine-like dissociatives; novel stimulants; novel psychedelics and several prescription and over-the-counter medicines. Conclusions. The ever-increasing changes in terms of recreational psychotropics’ availability represent a relatively new challenge for psychiatry, as the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of many NPS have not been thoroughly understood. Health/mental health professionals should be informed about the range of NPS; their intake modalities; their psychoactive sought-after effects; the idiosyncratic psychotropics’ combinations and finally, their medical and psychopathological risks.

Notes

© Cambridge University Press 2019. This article was submitted to Psychological Medicine with incorrect author affiliation. 'LVRKlinikum Essen, Klinik fur Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany' should read 'LVR-Klinikum Essen, Klinik fur Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany'. This has been updated per the above.

ID: 17435405