University of Hertfordshire

By the same authors

Producing a Justification: Waismann on Ethics and Science

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFriedrich Waismann
Subtitle of host publicationThe Open Texture of Analytic Philosophy
EditorsStewart Shapiro, Dejan Makovec
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter8
Pages47-66
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-030-25008-9
ISBN (Print)978-3-030-25007-2
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Sep 2019

Publication series

Name History of Analytic Philosophy

Abstract

Constantine Sandis takes on a very first evaluation of Waismann’s essay and shows that Waismann’s discussion of the scientific constrains on ethics is very much not anti-scientistic. Unlike Wittgenstein, Waismann does not dismiss morality as nonsense. Sandis associates Waismann’s view with expressivism, similar to the emotivism defended by his contemporary C.L. Stevenson, and points out a shared motivation with Derek Parfit’s more recent On What Matters. In an existentialist fashion Waismann invokes one’s freedom and responsibility in opting for different ethical systems, once one stops asking for moral truth and starts to choose and decide. In a detailed criticism of Waismann’s essay Sandis asks what our choosing and deciding could be based on if not in turn a normative discourse based on reasons.

Notes

© The Author(s) 2019.

ID: 17685759