University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

Standard

Response to ‘On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: response to Fenton et al’. / Berger, Dan.

In: Science & Justice, Vol. 54, No. 4, 05.07.2014, p. 319-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{f7575ef9ce9c4d4aaa72b8733cd6b8af,
title = "Response to ‘On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: response to Fenton et al’",
author = "Dan Berger",
note = "N. Fenton,D. Lagnado, A. Hsu, D. Berger, and M. Neil, 'Response to “On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al.”', Reply to Letter to the Editor, Science & Justice, Vol. 54(4): 319-320, July 2014. Available online at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.005",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "319--320",
journal = "Science & Justice",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to ‘On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: response to Fenton et al’

AU - Berger, Dan

N1 - N. Fenton,D. Lagnado, A. Hsu, D. Berger, and M. Neil, 'Response to “On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al.”', Reply to Letter to the Editor, Science & Justice, Vol. 54(4): 319-320, July 2014. Available online at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.005

PY - 2014/7/5

Y1 - 2014/7/5

U2 - 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.005

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 54

SP - 319

EP - 320

JO - Science & Justice

JF - Science & Justice

IS - 4

ER -