University of Hertfordshire

By the same authors

Documents

  • 906773

    Submitted manuscript, 82 KB, PDF document

View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages7
Pages (from-to)98-104
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Journal publication dateJan 2014
Volume140
Issue1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Abstract

In the light of current controversy about the nature of intrusions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the review by Brewin (2014) is timely and important. It will undoubtedly stimulate further research and guide researchers' quests for understanding the nature of flashbacks in PTSD. In this commentary, I briefly summarize and discuss key points made by Brewin and elaborate on some of the reasons behind the controversy. For example, the terms involuntary autobiographical memories, intrusive memories, and flashbacks are often used interchangeably. I propose a taxonomy revealing the key differences across these forms of memory. If flashbacks are characteristic of patients with PTSD only, it is essential that more research targeting this population is conducted with a variety of methods. Finally, some new avenues for research to study intrusive memories and flashbacks in PTSD, using a diary method and modified trauma film paradigm, are described.

Notes

"This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record."

ID: 2845507