University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

Documents

  • 907213

    Accepted author manuscript, 257 KB, PDF document

View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages12
Pages (from-to)1-12
JournalJournal of Education and Work
Journal publication date2 Jan 2017
Volume30
Issue1
Early online date16 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2017

Abstract

National Qualifications Frameworks (NQFs) are a global phenomenon. This is evidenced by their scale, coverage and intrinsic link with education policy across Europe and beyond. Research into their impact has encompassed a number of perspectives; theoretical, practical and evaluative. Yet, despite the existence of critical literature related to the development, design and impact of NQFs, little research has questioned the actual feasibility of researching the ‘impact’ of NQFs per se. The arguments in this paper position such research as both unfeasible and futile: a dream for which it is impossible to identify a suitable yardstick to measure. We base our argument around three broad themes: linguistics and semantics; homogeneity and; methodological complexity. Around these themes we aim to show why such research has proved problematic and, in doing so, contribute to the field as it explores the impact of NQFs in the future.

Notes

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Education and Work on 16 December 2015. Under embargo. Embargo end date: 16June 2017. The version of record is available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13639080.2015.1122178

ID: 9479304