University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

  • EADV Task Force on Quality of Life
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
Pages (from-to)424-431
JournalJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Journal publication dateMar 2017
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes


The aim of this study was to describe the many ways in which quality of life (QoL) measurement may potentially be advantageous in routine clinical dermatology practice. Thirteen members of the EADV Task Force on Quality of Life, eight dermatologists, three health psychologists, one epidemiologist and one pharmacoepidemiologist, independently listed all of the ways they thought this may be advantageous. A total of 108 different ways of using QoL information in clinical practice were suggested (median per participant = 8, range = 4-15), and were classified into 20 descriptive groups. These were sorted into the following five categories: inform clinical decisions, clinician-patient communication, awareness of skin disease burden, informing the consultation and clinical service administration. The wide range of potential benefits identified may not only encourage clinicians to use these measures but also highlights many areas requiring evidence to establish the true value of routine use of QoL measures.

ID: 14843239