Keyphrases
Accuracy Improvement
9%
Adaptive Time Stepping
9%
Aircraft Design
27%
Challenging Contexts
6%
Combined Method
13%
Comparable Accuracy
9%
Comparison with Experimental Data
6%
Computational Efficiency
9%
Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation
18%
Computational Power
9%
Design Analysis
9%
Drag Friction
6%
Drag Prediction
27%
Dynamic Analysis
27%
Dynamic Behavior
18%
Dynamic Solver
9%
Fast Mode
9%
Flow Vortex
27%
Frequency Response
9%
Generalized Vortex
9%
High Efficiency
10%
High-fidelity Simulation
6%
High-Order Computational Fluid Dynamics
9%
Hypervelocity
13%
Improved Prediction
6%
Induced Flow
9%
Lattice Boltzmann Method
27%
Lifting Surface
27%
Low-order Method
15%
Lower Order
10%
Mach Cone
27%
Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB)
9%
Potential Flow Solver
6%
Power Requirement
9%
Preliminary Aircraft Design
6%
Skin Friction Drag
6%
Step Response
9%
Supersonic Aerodynamics
27%
Supersonic Aircraft
54%
Supersonic Flow
20%
Supersonic Transport
10%
Supersonic Vehicle
6%
Tornado
27%
Tornado-like Vortex
9%
Total Drag
6%
Truncation Error
9%
Unsteady Analysis
9%
Unsteady Vortex Lattice Method
27%
Vortex Lattice Method
100%
Wave Drag
6%
Engineering
Combined Method
13%
Computational Cost
6%
Computational Efficiency
5%
Computational Fluid Dynamics
19%
Computational Power
5%
Design Analysis
5%
Drag Force
6%
Dynamic Behavior
10%
Flow Solver
6%
Frequency Response
5%
Lattice Method
81%
Lift Force
6%
Lifting Surface
27%
Mach Cone
27%
Numerical Model
6%
Potential Flow
6%
Power Requirement
5%
Prediction Error
6%
Preliminary Design
12%
Shockwave
6%
Simplifies
6%
Skin Friction Drag
6%
Step Response
5%
Supersonic Aircraft
54%
Supersonic Flow
20%
Total Drag
6%
Truncation Error
5%
Vortex
81%
Wave Drag
6%
Physics
Aircraft Design
27%
Lattice-Boltzmann Method
27%
Potential Flow
34%
Supersonics
54%
Vortex Lattice Method
54%
