Abstract
A zombie is a physical duplicates of a human being which lacks consciousness. A ghost is a phenomenal duplicate of a human being whose nature is exhausted by consciousness. Discussion of zombie arguments, that is anti-physicalist arguments which appeal to the conceivability of zombies, is familiar in the philosophy of mind literature, whilst ghostly arguments, that is, anti-physicalist arguments which appeal to the conceivability of ghosts, are somewhat neglected. In this paper I argue that ghostly arguments have a number of dialectical advantages over zombie arguments. I go onto explain how the conceivability of ghosts is inconsistent with two kinds of a priori physicalism: analytic functionalism and the Australian physicalism of Armstrong and Lewis. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 742-746 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Consciousness and cognition |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 2 Apr 2011 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2012 |