A priori physicalism, lonely ghosts and cartesian doubt

Philip Goff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A zombie is a physical duplicates of a human being which lacks consciousness. A ghost is a phenomenal duplicate of a human being whose nature is exhausted by consciousness. Discussion of zombie arguments, that is anti-physicalist arguments which appeal to the conceivability of zombies, is familiar in the philosophy of mind literature, whilst ghostly arguments, that is, anti-physicalist arguments which appeal to the conceivability of ghosts, are somewhat neglected. In this paper I argue that ghostly arguments have a number of dialectical advantages over zombie arguments. I go onto explain how the conceivability of ghosts is inconsistent with two kinds of a priori physicalism: analytic functionalism and the Australian physicalism of Armstrong and Lewis. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)742-746
Number of pages5
JournalConsciousness and cognition
Volume21
Issue number2
Early online date2 Apr 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A priori physicalism, lonely ghosts and cartesian doubt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this