A referrals audit and qualitative analysis of staff experience of referrals in a specialist community learning disability service

Natalie McMahon, Warner Katie, Jacqui Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Specialist community teams are set up to support people living with Learning Disability (LD) who are unable to access mainstream mental health (MH) teams with reasonable adjustments. National guidance is available to guide best practice in making reasonable adjustments, to support increased access to mainstream services. This audit of referrals into a specialist Community LD team, aimed to establish referral acceptance rates and reasons for referral rejection. Total referrals and referrals made specifically from mainstream MH teams were investigated. A focus group explored LD clinicians’ experiences of the referral process and criteria in the context of working alongside mainstream MH teams. A lower acceptance rate of referrals from mainstream MH teams than overall acceptance rate was found, and differences in the reasons for rejection were highlighted. No LD diagnosis in the referral was the most common rejection reason for mainstream MH team referrals. Thematic analysis highlighted four themes of clinician’s experiences which focused on: referral point struggles; service limitations; lack of diagnostic clarity; and attempts to bridge a gap between services. Recommendations include review of the referral process, joint working protocols, clarification of remit and dissemination of shared learning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-34
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Psychology Forum
Volume374
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 7 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Learning disability
  • clinician experience
  • referrals
  • mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A referrals audit and qualitative analysis of staff experience of referrals in a specialist community learning disability service'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this