Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Accounting for the foreground contribution to the dust emission towards Kepler's supernova remnant

  • H.L. Gomez
  • , L. Dunne
  • , R.J. Ivison
  • , E.M. Reynoso
  • , M.A. Thompson
  • , B. Sibthorpe
  • , S.A. Eales
  • , T.M. Delaney
  • , S. Maddox
  • , K. Isaak

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    31 Citations (Scopus)
    41 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Whether or not supernovae contribute significantly to the overall dust budget is a controversial subject. Submillimetre (sub-mm) observations, sensitive to cold dust, have shown an excess at 450 and 850 μm in young remnants Cassiopeia A (Cas A) and Kepler. Some of the sub-mm emission from Cas A has been shown to be contaminated by unrelated material along the line of sight. In this paper, we explore the emission from material towards Kepler using sub-mm continuum imaging and spectroscopic observations of atomic and molecular gas, via H i, 12CO(J= 2–1) and 13CO(J= 2–1). We detect weak CO emission (peak T*A = 0.2–1 K, 1–2 km s−1 full width at half-maximum) from diffuse, optically thin gas at the locations of some of the sub-mm clumps. The contribution to the sub-mm emission from foreground molecular and atomic clouds is negligible. The revised dust mass for Kepler's remnant is 0.1–1.2 M⊙ , about half of the quoted values in the original study by Morgan et al., but still sufficient to explain the origin of dust at high redshifts.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1621-1632
    Number of pages12
    JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS)
    Volume397
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • Supernovae: Kepler , ISM: submillimetre dust , radio lines: ISM , Galaxies: abundances , submillimetre

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for the foreground contribution to the dust emission towards Kepler's supernova remnant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this