TY - JOUR
T1 - Agreeing on generalised Darwinism
T2 - A response to Pavel Pelikan
AU - Hodgson, G.M.
AU - Knudsen, T.
N1 - Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Pelikan (J Evol Econ 21:341-366, 2011) develops an interesting conceptual framework that adds to prior work on generalised Darwinism. Despite claims to the contrary we show that it is similar to the approach developed by Hodgson and Knudsen (J Evol Econ 16(4):343-366, 2006a, J Econ Behav Organ 75(1):12-24, 2010a, b), Aldrich et al. (J Evol Econ 18(5):577-596, 2008) and others. Pelikan also mischaracterises the Hodgson-Knudsen position over Lamarckism. We show why the term is misleading (rather than strictly wrong) when applied to social evolution. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
AB - Pelikan (J Evol Econ 21:341-366, 2011) develops an interesting conceptual framework that adds to prior work on generalised Darwinism. Despite claims to the contrary we show that it is similar to the approach developed by Hodgson and Knudsen (J Evol Econ 16(4):343-366, 2006a, J Econ Behav Organ 75(1):12-24, 2010a, b), Aldrich et al. (J Evol Econ 18(5):577-596, 2008) and others. Pelikan also mischaracterises the Hodgson-Knudsen position over Lamarckism. We show why the term is misleading (rather than strictly wrong) when applied to social evolution. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855344314&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00191-011-0249-x
DO - 10.1007/s00191-011-0249-x
M3 - Article
SN - 0936-9937
VL - 22
SP - 9
EP - 18
JO - Journal of Evolutionary Economics
JF - Journal of Evolutionary Economics
IS - 1
ER -