TY - JOUR
T1 - Alpha-blockade and calcium antagonism
T2 - an effective and well-tolerated combination for the treatment of resistant hypertension
AU - Brown, M.J.
AU - Dickerson, Claire
N1 - Copyright Lippincott-Raven Publishers [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
PY - 1995
Y1 - 1995
N2 - Objective: To test whether the combination of calcium antagonism is additive with the other newer antihypertensives, namely [alpha]-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Design: Three-way double-blind, Latin-square crossover studies in two groups of 12 patients with essential hypertension. The three treatment periods were amlodipine, doxazosin (study A) or enalapril (study B), and the combination of amlodipine with the second drug. Methods: Each treatment was taken for 1 month, preceded by a 2-week single-blind run-in period, in which the patients received a low dose of doxazosin (study A) or enalapril (study B) to enable recruitment of patients with moderate or severe hypertension. Blood pressure, foot volume and plasma noradrenaline concentration were measured at the end of each run-in and treatment period. Results: The combination of [alpha]-blockade and calcium antagonism caused a fall in supine and erect blood pressures. These falls were significantly greater than on either drug alone, and greater than the sum of the falls when taking the individual drugs. The combination of amlodipine and the ACE inhibitor was also additive. Both combinations with amlodipine were tolerated well by all patients. Conclusions: The combination of [alpha]-blockade and calcium antagonism has not previously been studied and should be useful for resistant hypertensives who have not tolerated P-blockade or ACE inhibitors. The combination of ACE inhibition and calcium antagonism has previously been shown to be additive; its use as a positive control in the present studies suggests that the use of an active drug for a run-in period may be a useful design for permitting the study of patients from whom all treatment cannot safely be withdrawn.
AB - Objective: To test whether the combination of calcium antagonism is additive with the other newer antihypertensives, namely [alpha]-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Design: Three-way double-blind, Latin-square crossover studies in two groups of 12 patients with essential hypertension. The three treatment periods were amlodipine, doxazosin (study A) or enalapril (study B), and the combination of amlodipine with the second drug. Methods: Each treatment was taken for 1 month, preceded by a 2-week single-blind run-in period, in which the patients received a low dose of doxazosin (study A) or enalapril (study B) to enable recruitment of patients with moderate or severe hypertension. Blood pressure, foot volume and plasma noradrenaline concentration were measured at the end of each run-in and treatment period. Results: The combination of [alpha]-blockade and calcium antagonism caused a fall in supine and erect blood pressures. These falls were significantly greater than on either drug alone, and greater than the sum of the falls when taking the individual drugs. The combination of amlodipine and the ACE inhibitor was also additive. Both combinations with amlodipine were tolerated well by all patients. Conclusions: The combination of [alpha]-blockade and calcium antagonism has not previously been studied and should be useful for resistant hypertensives who have not tolerated P-blockade or ACE inhibitors. The combination of ACE inhibition and calcium antagonism has previously been shown to be additive; its use as a positive control in the present studies suggests that the use of an active drug for a run-in period may be a useful design for permitting the study of patients from whom all treatment cannot safely be withdrawn.
M3 - Article
SN - 0263-6352
VL - 13
SP - 701
EP - 707
JO - Journal of Hypertension
JF - Journal of Hypertension
IS - 6
ER -