TY - JOUR
T1 - An early marker for semantic memory impairment in patients with schizophrenia
AU - Al-Uzri, M.M.
AU - Laws, K.R.
AU - Mortimer, A.M.
N1 - Original article can be found at: http://www.informaworld.com Copyright Informa / Taylor and Francis Group [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Introduction: Semantic memory impairment is now a well-documented phenomenon in patients with schizophrenia. Nevertheless, the characteristics of this deficit and any early markers remain contentious. Methods: In this preliminary study, 12 schizophrenic patients underwent longitudinal assessment using a battery of semantic memory tests. Patient performance was compared to 12 matched controls. Using set criteria (derived from Warrington & Shallice, 1979), we examined whether the patients had a disorder affecting access to intact representations, or a degradation/loss of the representations themselves. The criteria were: consistency across time and modality, level of attribute information, and responsiveness to cueing. Finally, we compared patient naming for the same items across two naming tests (naming-to-description and picture naming) to determine cross-modality consistency. Results: As expected, normal controls outperformed the patients on all tests. Naming-to-description was the most significant differentiator between patients and controls. Patients were inconsistent across both time and modality, showed minimal attributional knowledge impairment, and improved significantly with cueing on two naming tests. Conclusion: The profile of results indicates an access-type semantic deficit in this cohort of patients with schizophrenic. Finally, on a naming-to-description task, the patients failed to name up to 20% of items that they could name to picture. This suggests that naming-to-definition may act as an early marker of semantic memory impairment.
AB - Introduction: Semantic memory impairment is now a well-documented phenomenon in patients with schizophrenia. Nevertheless, the characteristics of this deficit and any early markers remain contentious. Methods: In this preliminary study, 12 schizophrenic patients underwent longitudinal assessment using a battery of semantic memory tests. Patient performance was compared to 12 matched controls. Using set criteria (derived from Warrington & Shallice, 1979), we examined whether the patients had a disorder affecting access to intact representations, or a degradation/loss of the representations themselves. The criteria were: consistency across time and modality, level of attribute information, and responsiveness to cueing. Finally, we compared patient naming for the same items across two naming tests (naming-to-description and picture naming) to determine cross-modality consistency. Results: As expected, normal controls outperformed the patients on all tests. Naming-to-description was the most significant differentiator between patients and controls. Patients were inconsistent across both time and modality, showed minimal attributional knowledge impairment, and improved significantly with cueing on two naming tests. Conclusion: The profile of results indicates an access-type semantic deficit in this cohort of patients with schizophrenic. Finally, on a naming-to-description task, the patients failed to name up to 20% of items that they could name to picture. This suggests that naming-to-definition may act as an early marker of semantic memory impairment.
KW - Psychology
U2 - 10.1080/13546800344000255
DO - 10.1080/13546800344000255
M3 - Article
SN - 1354-6805
VL - 9
SP - 267
EP - 279
JO - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
JF - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
IS - 4
ER -