An evaluation of staff engagement programmes in four National Health Service Acute Trusts

Business & Economics

• National Health Service 89%
• Staff 50%
• Evaluation 49%
• Evaluation Design 15%
• Appreciative Inquiry 14%
• Mixed Methods 14%
• England 13%
• Impact Evaluation 13%
• Chief Executives 13%
• Middle Management 12%
• Workforce 11%
• Organizational Context 9%
• Health Care Organization 9%
• Decision Making 8%
• Confidence 8%
• Communication 6%
• Design Methodology 4%

Medicine & Life Sciences

• Work Engagement 100%
• National Health Programs 74%
• Organizations 35%
• England 28%
• Workforce 13%
• Evaluation Studies 12%
• Decision Making 11%
• Communication 10%
• Interviews 9%
• Delivery of Health Care 8%

Social Sciences

• health service 56%
• staff 42%
• evaluation 32%
• leadership 12%
• chief executive 12%
• document analysis 10%
• confidence 7%
• health care 7%
• demand 6%
• decision making 6%
• communication 5%
• lack 5%
• methodology 5%
• management 4%
• interview 4%
• literature 4%