TY - JOUR
T1 - Answering contextually demanding questions
T2 - pragmatic errors produced by children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism
AU - Loukusa, S.
AU - Leinonen, E.
AU - Jussila, K.
AU - Mattila, M.
AU - Ryder, N.
AU - Ebeling, H.
AU - Moilanen, I.
N1 - Original article can be found at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00219924 Copyright Elsevier Inc. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.10.001 [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - This study examined irrelevant/incorrect answers produced by children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism (7–9-year-olds and 10–12-year-olds) and normally developing children (7–9-year-olds). The errors produced were divided into three types: in Type 1, the child answered the original question incorrectly, in Type 2, the child gave a correct answer, but when asked a follow-up question, he/she explained the answer incorrectly, and in Type 3, the child first gave a correct answer or explanation, but continued answering, which ultimately led to an irrelevant answer. Analyses of Type 1 and 2 errors indicated that all the children tried to utilize contextual information, albeit incorrectly. Analyses of Type 3 errors showed that topic drifts were almost non-existent in the control group, but common in the clinical group, suggesting that these children had difficulties in stopping processing after deriving a relevant answer.
AB - This study examined irrelevant/incorrect answers produced by children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism (7–9-year-olds and 10–12-year-olds) and normally developing children (7–9-year-olds). The errors produced were divided into three types: in Type 1, the child answered the original question incorrectly, in Type 2, the child gave a correct answer, but when asked a follow-up question, he/she explained the answer incorrectly, and in Type 3, the child first gave a correct answer or explanation, but continued answering, which ultimately led to an irrelevant answer. Analyses of Type 1 and 2 errors indicated that all the children tried to utilize contextual information, albeit incorrectly. Analyses of Type 3 errors showed that topic drifts were almost non-existent in the control group, but common in the clinical group, suggesting that these children had difficulties in stopping processing after deriving a relevant answer.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.10.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.10.001
M3 - Article
SN - 0021-9924
VL - 40
SP - 357
EP - 381
JO - Journal of Communication Disorders
JF - Journal of Communication Disorders
IS - 5
ER -