Abstract
Objectives
To determine whether back foot (BF) position influences dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM) during three different positions of the weight bearing lunge test (WBLT).
Design
Randomised, repeated measures design.
Setting
Sports clubs.
Participants
52 athletes participating in cutting and pivoting sports.
Main outcome measures
DFROM was obtained using a WBLT in three different BF positions: BF heel in full contact with the floor, BF heel raised off the floor and BF was non weight bearing (NWB). All measurements were obtained using three methods: inclinometer at the tibial tuberosity, toe to wall distance and goniometer angle from the lateral malleolus to the fibula head. Differences between testing positions were determined using a repeated measures one-way ANOVA and reliability analysis was performed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
Results
DFROM was statistically significantly different for all three positions of the WBLT for each measurement technique (P < .001). These results were associated with large effect sizes for all BF positions and measurement techniques. Reliability ICC values were excellent for all measurements (ICC 0.94–0.99).
Conclusions
Results show that DFROM differs depending upon the position of the BF during the WBLT. Further research is needed to establish the reproducibility of these three BF positions due to the variability observed.
To determine whether back foot (BF) position influences dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM) during three different positions of the weight bearing lunge test (WBLT).
Design
Randomised, repeated measures design.
Setting
Sports clubs.
Participants
52 athletes participating in cutting and pivoting sports.
Main outcome measures
DFROM was obtained using a WBLT in three different BF positions: BF heel in full contact with the floor, BF heel raised off the floor and BF was non weight bearing (NWB). All measurements were obtained using three methods: inclinometer at the tibial tuberosity, toe to wall distance and goniometer angle from the lateral malleolus to the fibula head. Differences between testing positions were determined using a repeated measures one-way ANOVA and reliability analysis was performed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
Results
DFROM was statistically significantly different for all three positions of the WBLT for each measurement technique (P < .001). These results were associated with large effect sizes for all BF positions and measurement techniques. Reliability ICC values were excellent for all measurements (ICC 0.94–0.99).
Conclusions
Results show that DFROM differs depending upon the position of the BF during the WBLT. Further research is needed to establish the reproducibility of these three BF positions due to the variability observed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Physical Therapy in Sport |
| Volume | 47 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2021 |