Abstract
This is a collaborative submission from a group of academics based in the UK with expertise in Information technology law and related areas. The preparation of the response has been funded by the British and Irish Law Education Law and Technology Association.
This response has been prepared by Dr Kim Barker, Dr Edina Harbinja, Professor Dinusha Mendis and Dr Felipe Romero-Moreno.
Dr Kim Barker is a lecturer at the University of Stirling.
Dr Edina Harbinja is a senior lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire.
Professor Dinusha Mendis is a professor at the University of Bournemouth.
Dr Felipe Romero-Moreno is a lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire.
Please note that the copyright of this Response remains with the author(s).
This response has been prepared by Dr Kim Barker, Dr Edina Harbinja, Professor Dinusha Mendis and Dr Felipe Romero-Moreno.
Dr Kim Barker is a lecturer at the University of Stirling.
Dr Edina Harbinja is a senior lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire.
Professor Dinusha Mendis is a professor at the University of Bournemouth.
Dr Felipe Romero-Moreno is a lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire.
Please note that the copyright of this Response remains with the author(s).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Type | BILETA Response to the House of Lords Select Committee on Communications Enquiry 'The Internet: to Regulate or Not to Regulate' |
Publisher | BILETA |
Number of pages | 15 |
Publication status | Published - 11 May 2018 |
Keywords
- intermediary liability
- hosting service providers
- notice and takedown
- notice and staydown
- Article 6 ECHR
- principle of equality of arms
- complaint and redress mechanisms
- 'put back' process
- freedom of expression
- AI
- algorithms
- real-time monitoring
- filtering
- blocking
- ECHR
- Charter of the EU
- ECtHR
- CJEU
- online community standards
- GDPR
- trasnparency
- GAFAS
- BATS
- Brexit