BILETA Response to the House of Lords Select Committee on Communications Enquiry 'The Internet: to Regulate or Not to Regulate'

Kim Barker, Edina Harbinja, Dinusha Mendis, Felipe Romero Moreno

Research output: Other contribution

209 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This is a collaborative submission from a group of academics based in the UK with expertise in Information technology law and related areas. The preparation of the response has been funded by the British and Irish Law Education Law and Technology Association.

This response has been prepared by Dr Kim Barker, Dr Edina Harbinja, Professor Dinusha Mendis and Dr Felipe Romero-Moreno.

Dr Kim Barker is a lecturer at the University of Stirling.
Dr Edina Harbinja is a senior lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire.
Professor Dinusha Mendis is a professor at the University of Bournemouth.
Dr Felipe Romero-Moreno is a lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire.

Please note that the copyright of this Response remains with the author(s).
Original languageEnglish
TypeBILETA Response to the House of Lords Select Committee on Communications Enquiry 'The Internet: to Regulate or Not to Regulate'
PublisherBILETA
Number of pages15
Publication statusPublished - 11 May 2018

Keywords

  • intermediary liability
  • hosting service providers
  • notice and takedown
  • notice and staydown
  • Article 6 ECHR
  • principle of equality of arms
  • complaint and redress mechanisms
  • 'put back' process
  • freedom of expression
  • AI
  • algorithms
  • real-time monitoring
  • filtering
  • blocking
  • ECHR
  • Charter of the EU
  • ECtHR
  • CJEU
  • online community standards
  • GDPR
  • trasnparency
  • GAFAS
  • BATS
  • Brexit

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'BILETA Response to the House of Lords Select Committee on Communications Enquiry 'The Internet: to Regulate or Not to Regulate''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this