Child Protection Vocabulary in Professional Judgement – Fit for Purpose?

Michael Fanner

doi:10.21100/gswr.v2i2.1327

Child Protection Vocabulary in Professional Judgement – Fit for Purpose?

Michael Fanner

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

63 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	171-172
Number of pages	172
Journal	Greenwich Social Work Review
Volume	2
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.21100/gswr.v2i2.1327
Publication status	Published - 18 Dec 2021

Keywords

Vocabulary
Child Protection
Safeguarding
Professional Judgement
Co-Production

Access to Document

10.21100/gswr.v2i2.1327

Final_Version
© 2021 Greenwich Social Work Review. This work is open access under a CC-BY-NC-SA license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en
Final published version, 198 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-SA

Cite this

@article{9ae8ab20738e45ffac5787ae6fd21a87,

title = "Child Protection Vocabulary in Professional Judgement – Fit for Purpose?",

keywords = "Vocabulary, Child Protection, Safeguarding, Professional Judgement, Co-Production",

author = "Michael Fanner",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 Greenwich Social Work Review. This work is open access under a CC-BY-NC-SA license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en",

year = "2021",

month = dec,

day = "18",

doi = "10.21100/gswr.v2i2.1327",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

pages = "171--172",

journal = "Greenwich Social Work Review",

issn = "2633-4313",