Combining scientific and lay knowledges - Participatory approaches to research in organic farming.

Frances Harris, Fergus Lyon

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter explores the issues of different types of knowledge and how they can be used to complement each other in organic farming research. Two specific issues are addressed: (1) what types of research and informal learning are carried out by farmers, and (2) how can farmers' own research add to and complement more traditional scientific methods of research? The chapter is based on research undertaken in 2003-04, which involved semi-structured interviews with a sample of 30 farmers and other agri-businesses in East Anglia and South West England. It is revealed that all farmers in the survey undertook some form of 'research', deploying a range of knowledge-generating practices from overt field experimentation mirroring scientific studies to more implicit, tacit assessment approaches. Farmer-scientist research collaboration was also common but is hampered by different priorities and an underestimation of farmers' existing research practices. The chapter concludes by advocating the extension of participatory research programmes to help generate more effective organic farming knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationsustainable farmland management: new transdiscplinary approaches.
EditorsR Fish, S Seymour, M Steven, C Watkins
Place of PublicationWallingford
PublisherCentre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI)
Pages94-106
Number of pages18
ISBN (Print)1845933516, 9781845933517
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • agricultural land
  • agricultural policy
  • ethics
  • farming systems
  • knowledge
  • land management
  • politics
  • sustainability
  • systems approach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Combining scientific and lay knowledges - Participatory approaches to research in organic farming.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this