Abstract
This paper presents results of a pilot study that
investigated whether people’s perceptions from live and video
HRI trials were comparable. Subjects participated in a live
HRI trial and videotaped HRI trials in which the scenario for
both trials was identical, and involved a robot fetching an
object using different approach directions. Results of the trials
indicated moderate to high levels of agreement for subjects’
preferences, and opinions for both the live and video based
HRI trials. This methodology is in its infancy and should not
be seen as a replacement for live trials. However, our results
indicate that for certain HRI scenarios videotaped trials do
have potential as a technique for prototyping, testing,
developing HRI scenarios, and testing methodologies for use in
definitive live trials.
investigated whether people’s perceptions from live and video
HRI trials were comparable. Subjects participated in a live
HRI trial and videotaped HRI trials in which the scenario for
both trials was identical, and involved a robot fetching an
object using different approach directions. Results of the trials
indicated moderate to high levels of agreement for subjects’
preferences, and opinions for both the live and video based
HRI trials. This methodology is in its infancy and should not
be seen as a replacement for live trials. However, our results
indicate that for certain HRI scenarios videotaped trials do
have potential as a technique for prototyping, testing,
developing HRI scenarios, and testing methodologies for use in
definitive live trials.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Procs 9th IEEE Int Workshop on Advanced Motion Control |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) |
Pages | 750-755 |
ISBN (Print) | 0-7803-9511-1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2006 |