Comparison of the anthelmintic efficacy of oxfendazole or ivermectin administered orally and ivermectin administered subcutaneously to sheep during the periparturient period

Quintin McKellar, S. E. Marriner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The suppression of nematode egg output in faeces was measured in ewes treated just before lambing with either oxfendazole or ivermectin by oral drench or with ivermectin by subcutaneous injection. Ivermectin and oxfendazole given orally were similarly effective, whereas ivermectin given by subcutaneous injection extended the period of suppressed egg output by about one week. The more persistent anthelmintic effect of ivermectin given subcutaneously was probably due to its extended half-life in the plasma of treated sheep. Plasma pepsinogen activity was less in the sheep given anthelmintic than in the untreated controls. Ivermectin caused a significantly greater reduction in pepsinogen activity than oxfendazole and was more effective when given subcutaneously than when given orally.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-6
Number of pages4
JournalVeterinary record
Volume120
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1987

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the anthelmintic efficacy of oxfendazole or ivermectin administered orally and ivermectin administered subcutaneously to sheep during the periparturient period'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this