Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and internet consumer contracts: some thoughts on article 15 and the futility of applying ‘in the box’ conflict of law rules to the ‘out of the box’ borderless world

Charles Wild; Stuart Weinstein; Christine Riefa

doi:10.1080/13600860500051002

Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and internet consumer contracts: some thoughts on article 15 and the futility of applying ‘in the box’ conflict of law rules to the ‘out of the box’ borderless world

Charles Wild, Stuart Weinstein, Christine Riefa

Schools of Law and Education

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The Internet is by definition a borderless medium. Reflecting on the Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and Internet Consumer Contracts, this article develops some thoughts on the futility of applying some traditional conflict of law rules to the borderless world. It focuses on a few aspects attempting to establish when thinking 'out of the box' may be of benefit to consumers and their protection under article 15.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	13-21
Number of pages	8
Journal	International Review of Law, Computers & Technology
Volume	19
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860500051002
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2005

Keywords

consumer protection
conflict of laws

Access to Document

10.1080/13600860500051002

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and internet consumer contracts: some thoughts on article 15 and the futility of applying ‘in the box’ conflict of law rules to the ‘out of the box’ borderless world'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{01d95bead0e14d1ca75e81ada9d54d9b,

title = "Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and internet consumer contracts: some thoughts on article 15 and the futility of applying {\textquoteleft}in the box{\textquoteright} conflict of law rules to the {\textquoteleft}out of the box{\textquoteright} borderless world",

abstract = "The Internet is by definition a borderless medium. Reflecting on the Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and Internet Consumer Contracts, this article develops some thoughts on the futility of applying some traditional conflict of law rules to the borderless world. It focuses on a few aspects attempting to establish when thinking 'out of the box' may be of benefit to consumers and their protection under article 15.",

keywords = "consumer protection, conflict of laws",

author = "Charles Wild and Stuart Weinstein and Christine Riefa",

year = "2005",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1080/13600860500051002",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "13--21",

journal = "International Review of Law, Computers \& Technology",

issn = "1360-0869",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "1",

}

Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and internet consumer contracts: some thoughts on article 15 and the futility of applying ‘in the box’ conflict of law rules to the ‘out of the box’ borderless world. / Wild, Charles; Weinstein, Stuart; Riefa, Christine.
In: International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 13-21.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and internet consumer contracts: some thoughts on article 15 and the futility of applying ‘in the box’ conflict of law rules to the ‘out of the box’ borderless world

AU - Wild, Charles

AU - Weinstein, Stuart

AU - Riefa, Christine

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - The Internet is by definition a borderless medium. Reflecting on the Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and Internet Consumer Contracts, this article develops some thoughts on the futility of applying some traditional conflict of law rules to the borderless world. It focuses on a few aspects attempting to establish when thinking 'out of the box' may be of benefit to consumers and their protection under article 15.

AB - The Internet is by definition a borderless medium. Reflecting on the Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and Internet Consumer Contracts, this article develops some thoughts on the futility of applying some traditional conflict of law rules to the borderless world. It focuses on a few aspects attempting to establish when thinking 'out of the box' may be of benefit to consumers and their protection under article 15.

KW - consumer protection

KW - conflict of laws

U2 - 10.1080/13600860500051002

DO - 10.1080/13600860500051002

M3 - Article

SN - 1360-0869

VL - 19

SP - 13

EP - 21

JO - International Review of Law, Computers & Technology

JF - International Review of Law, Computers & Technology

IS - 1

ER -