Abstract
Aims This study aimed to assess the scope of newborn infant
physical examination (NIPE) education in post-registration
midwifery education, determine the structure and requirements for
midwives undertaking NIPE training, and explore similarities and
differences in pre- and post-registration preparation requirements.
Methods In early 2015, all lead midwives for education in the UK
were sent a link to an online questionnaire to assess the scope and
practice of NIPE education across all midwifery curricula. This
is the second of a two-part report, focusing on post-registration
education; part A examined the education provision for the inclusion
of NIPE in the midwifery curriculum.
Findings NIPE education for midwives is popular and is well
established in the post-registration curriculum. Variations exist in
the length, content, assessment, levels of study and credits awarded
for post-registration NIPE modules. This lack of standardisation
raises questions about quality assurance.
Conclusion The variation in module length has implications for
commissioners and self-funding students, as longer NIPE modules
are more costly. There is a strong argument for a standardised NIPE
programme across the UK and for providers of maternity services to
fully utilise midwives who have been trained in NIPE to avoid them
becoming de-skilled.
physical examination (NIPE) education in post-registration
midwifery education, determine the structure and requirements for
midwives undertaking NIPE training, and explore similarities and
differences in pre- and post-registration preparation requirements.
Methods In early 2015, all lead midwives for education in the UK
were sent a link to an online questionnaire to assess the scope and
practice of NIPE education across all midwifery curricula. This
is the second of a two-part report, focusing on post-registration
education; part A examined the education provision for the inclusion
of NIPE in the midwifery curriculum.
Findings NIPE education for midwives is popular and is well
established in the post-registration curriculum. Variations exist in
the length, content, assessment, levels of study and credits awarded
for post-registration NIPE modules. This lack of standardisation
raises questions about quality assurance.
Conclusion The variation in module length has implications for
commissioners and self-funding students, as longer NIPE modules
are more costly. There is a strong argument for a standardised NIPE
programme across the UK and for providers of maternity services to
fully utilise midwives who have been trained in NIPE to avoid them
becoming de-skilled.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 88-92 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | British Journal of Midwifery |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Feb 2017 |
Keywords
- midwifery
- post-registration education
- newborn infant physical examination
- neonatal
- training
- curriculum