Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens

Henrik Stotz; Georgia Mitrousia; Pierre de Wit; Bruce D.L. Fitt

doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009

Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens

Henrik Stotz, Georgia Mitrousia, Pierre de Wit, Bruce D.L. Fitt

Research output: Contribution to journal › Literature review › peer-review

102 Citations (Scopus)

243 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed ‘effector-triggered defence’ (ETD). Unlike PTI and ETI, ETD is mediated by R genes encoding cell
surface-localised receptor-like proteins (RLPs) that engage the receptor-like kinase SOBIR1. In contrast to this extracellular recognition, ETI is initiated by intracellular detection of pathogen effectors. ETI is usually associated
with fast, hypersensitive host cell death, whereas ETD often triggers host cell death only after an elapsed period of endophytic pathogen growth. In this opinion, we focus on ETD responses against foliar fungal pathogens of crops

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	491-500
Number of pages	10
Journal	Trends in Plant Science
Volume	19
Issue number	8
Early online date	22 May 2014
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009
Publication status	Published - 1 Aug 2014

Access to Document

10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009Licence: CC BY

906813
Copyright 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
Final published version, 1.89 MB

http://youtu.be/Y9RoGrsZGCY

Cite this

@article{d2d132ca8d68440aab34eb11a14a4541,

title = "Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens",

abstract = "R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed {\textquoteleft}effector-triggered defence{\textquoteright} (ETD). Unlike PTI and ETI, ETD is mediated by R genes encoding cell surface-localised receptor-like proteins (RLPs) that engage the receptor-like kinase SOBIR1. In contrast to this extracellular recognition, ETI is initiated by intracellular detection of pathogen effectors. ETI is usually associated with fast, hypersensitive host cell death, whereas ETD often triggers host cell death only after an elapsed period of endophytic pathogen growth. In this opinion, we focus on ETD responses against foliar fungal pathogens of crops",

author = "Henrik Stotz and Georgia Mitrousia and {de Wit}, Pierre and Fitt, {Bruce D.L.}",

year = "2014",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "491--500",

journal = "Trends in Plant Science",

issn = "1878-4372",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens

AU - Stotz, Henrik

AU - Mitrousia, Georgia

AU - de Wit, Pierre

AU - Fitt, Bruce D.L.

PY - 2014/8/1

Y1 - 2014/8/1

N2 - R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed ‘effector-triggered defence’ (ETD). Unlike PTI and ETI, ETD is mediated by R genes encoding cell surface-localised receptor-like proteins (RLPs) that engage the receptor-like kinase SOBIR1. In contrast to this extracellular recognition, ETI is initiated by intracellular detection of pathogen effectors. ETI is usually associated with fast, hypersensitive host cell death, whereas ETD often triggers host cell death only after an elapsed period of endophytic pathogen growth. In this opinion, we focus on ETD responses against foliar fungal pathogens of crops

AB - R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed ‘effector-triggered defence’ (ETD). Unlike PTI and ETI, ETD is mediated by R genes encoding cell surface-localised receptor-like proteins (RLPs) that engage the receptor-like kinase SOBIR1. In contrast to this extracellular recognition, ETI is initiated by intracellular detection of pathogen effectors. ETI is usually associated with fast, hypersensitive host cell death, whereas ETD often triggers host cell death only after an elapsed period of endophytic pathogen growth. In this opinion, we focus on ETD responses against foliar fungal pathogens of crops

U2 - 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009

DO - 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009

M3 - Literature review

SN - 1878-4372

VL - 19

SP - 491

EP - 500

JO - Trends in Plant Science

JF - Trends in Plant Science

IS - 8

ER -

Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this