Eram, ergo sum? A 1-year retrospective study of General Pharmaceutical Council fitness to practise hearings

C. T. Gallagher, Victoria A. M. Greenland, Adrienne C. Hickman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The principal aims of this research were: to assess whether aggravating and mitigating circumstances considered by the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) when imposing sanctions are considered when determining impairment of fitness to practise and to determine whether those circumstances described by the GPhC in their Indicative Sanctions Guidance (ISG) as warranting erasure from the Register of Pharmacists lead to that outcome.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-211
JournalInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP)
Volume23
Issue number3
Early online date3 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Eram, ergo sum? A 1-year retrospective study of General Pharmaceutical Council fitness to practise hearings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this