TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethical interpretations of management decision making in higher education
AU - Shelley, S.
N1 - Original article can be found at: https://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 Copyright Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - This paper explores the ethical dimensions of constraint and choice in management decision making at different levels, with a focus on how managers manage and are themselves managed in UK higher education, a sector of national importance and rapid growth. The ethical interpretations are complex, for whilst decision making at state level is seen to meet the needs of various stakeholders, it is argued that the way decisions are enacted in universities is predominantly managerial as funding and quality structures impose a utilitarian ethic. Within this, the scope to take a more humanist decision stance is often over-ridden, resulting in conflict, poor performance, inefficiency and negative, somewhat perverse outcomes for the student learning experience and for knowledge generation. The paper makes the case that ethical sensitivity should be embedded in new management development programmes, thus enabling managers to exercise autonomous reasoning and meet the needs of a wider range of stakeholders.
AB - This paper explores the ethical dimensions of constraint and choice in management decision making at different levels, with a focus on how managers manage and are themselves managed in UK higher education, a sector of national importance and rapid growth. The ethical interpretations are complex, for whilst decision making at state level is seen to meet the needs of various stakeholders, it is argued that the way decisions are enacted in universities is predominantly managerial as funding and quality structures impose a utilitarian ethic. Within this, the scope to take a more humanist decision stance is often over-ridden, resulting in conflict, poor performance, inefficiency and negative, somewhat perverse outcomes for the student learning experience and for knowledge generation. The paper makes the case that ethical sensitivity should be embedded in new management development programmes, thus enabling managers to exercise autonomous reasoning and meet the needs of a wider range of stakeholders.
U2 - 10.1504/IJMDM.2005.006554
DO - 10.1504/IJMDM.2005.006554
M3 - Article
SN - 1462-4621
VL - 6
SP - 284
EP - 298
JO - International Journal of Management and Decision Making
JF - International Journal of Management and Decision Making
IS - 3-4
ER -