Facing the “new normal”: How adjusting to the easing of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions exposes mental health inequalities  

Naomi Fineberg, Luca Pellegrini, David Wellsted, Natalie Hall, Ornella Corazza, Valentina Giorgetti, Dorotea Cicconcelli, Elena Theofanous, Nick Sireau, David Adam, Samuel R. Chamberlain, Keith Laws

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Re-establishing societal norms in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic will be important for restoring public mental health and psychosocial wellbeing as well as economic recovery. We investigated the impact on post-pandemic adjustment of a history of mental disorder, with particular reference to obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms or traits.

METHODS: The study was pre-registered (Open Science Framework; https://osf.io/gs8j2/). Adult members of the public (n = 514) were surveyed between July and November 2020, to identify the extent to which they reported difficulties re-adjusting as lockdown conditions eased. All were assessed using validated scales to determine which demographic and mental health-related factors impacted adjustment. An exploratory analysis of a subgroup on an objective online test of cognitive inflexibility was also performed.

RESULTS: Adjustment was related to a history of mental disorder and the presence of OC symptoms and traits, all acting indirectly and statistically-mediated via depression, anxiety and stress; and in the case of OC symptoms, also via COVID-related anxiety (all p < 0.001). One hundred and twenty-eight (25%) participants reported significant adjustment difficulties and were compared with those self-identifying as "good adjusters" (n = 231). This comparison revealed over-representation of those with a history or family history of mental disorder in the poor adjustment category (all p < 0.05). 'Poor-adjusters' additionally reported higher COVID-related anxiety, depression, anxiety and stress and OC symptoms and traits (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, history of mental disorder directly statistically mediated adjustment status (p < 0.01), whereas OC symptoms (not OC traits) acted indirectly via COVID-related anxiety (p < 0.001). Poor-adjusters also showed evidence of greater cognitive inflexibility on the intra-extra-dimensional set-shift task.

CONCLUSION: Individuals with a history of mental disorder, OC symptoms and OC traits experienced greater difficulties adjusting after lockdown-release, largely statistically mediated by increased depression, anxiety, including COVID-related anxiety, and stress. The implications for clinical and public health policies and interventions are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276-286
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Research
Volume141
Early online date6 Jul 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2021

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Cognitive inflexibility
  • Lockdown release
  • Mental-health
  • Obsessive-compulsive
  • Pandemic
  • Anxiety/epidemiology
  • Pandemics
  • Health Status Disparities
  • Humans
  • Mental Health
  • Communicable Disease Control
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Depression/epidemiology
  • Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Facing the “new normal”: How adjusting to the easing of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions exposes mental health inequalities  '. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this