Abstract
The capability to engage in conversation is the hallmark of our species
and possibly an important factor for a machine to be considered a social other. In contrast to the recent advances in text-based natural language processing in the form of large language models, embodied, multimodal speech-based interaction relies on rapid interpersonal processes. Some of these processes appear to be automatic or semi-automatic, indicating that not everything that happens in conversations is under conscious control.
While research into the exact details and technical implementation of these
processes is still in its early stages, we have found indications that a human interactor's perception of a robot at least partially hinges on whether a robot can engage in these processes at the required speed. In this short paper, I will present two such interactions and the "pull" that a timely and appropriate response exerts on the human interactor.
From a more theoretical perspective, the presented observations are broadly in
support of Seibt's, Vestergaard's, and Damholdt's proposal to occasionally replace references to anthropomorphization with the notion of sociomorphing when explaining a person's apparent attribution of social qualities to a robot. Where anthropomorphization requires conscious and slow high-level cognitive processes, sociomorphing as a variant of direct perception may be automatic, fast, and sub- or preconscious.
and possibly an important factor for a machine to be considered a social other. In contrast to the recent advances in text-based natural language processing in the form of large language models, embodied, multimodal speech-based interaction relies on rapid interpersonal processes. Some of these processes appear to be automatic or semi-automatic, indicating that not everything that happens in conversations is under conscious control.
While research into the exact details and technical implementation of these
processes is still in its early stages, we have found indications that a human interactor's perception of a robot at least partially hinges on whether a robot can engage in these processes at the required speed. In this short paper, I will present two such interactions and the "pull" that a timely and appropriate response exerts on the human interactor.
From a more theoretical perspective, the presented observations are broadly in
support of Seibt's, Vestergaard's, and Damholdt's proposal to occasionally replace references to anthropomorphization with the notion of sociomorphing when explaining a person's apparent attribution of social qualities to a robot. Where anthropomorphization requires conscious and slow high-level cognitive processes, sociomorphing as a variant of direct perception may be automatic, fast, and sub- or preconscious.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Social Robots with AI: Prospects, Risks, and Responsible Methods |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2024 |
Editors | Johanna Seibt, Peter Fazekas, Oliver Santiago Quick |
Publisher | IOS Press |
Pages | 613 - 617 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Volume | 397 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-64368-568-7 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-64368-567-0 |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 28 Feb 2025 |
Event | Robophilosophy Conference 2024: Social Robots With AI: Prospects, Risks, and Responsible Methods - Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Duration: 19 Aug 2024 → 23 Aug 2024 https://cas.au.dk/en/robophilosophy/conferences/rpc2024 |
Publication series
Name | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications |
---|---|
Publisher | IOS |
Volume | 397 |
ISSN (Print) | 0922-6389 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 1879-8314 |
Conference
Conference | Robophilosophy Conference 2024 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Denmark |
City | Aarhus |
Period | 19/08/24 → 23/08/24 |
Internet address |