Function and Organization: Comparing the mechanisms of protein synthesis and natural selection

Phyllis McKay Illari, Jon Williamson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we compare the mechanisms of protein synthesis and natural selection. We identify three core elements of mechanistic explanation: functional individuation, hierarchical nestedness or decomposition, and organization. These are now well understood elements of mechanistic explanation in fields such as protein synthesis, and widely accepted in the mechanisms literature. But Skipper and Millstein have argued (2005) that natural selection is neither decomposable nor organized. This would mean that much of the current mechanisms literature does not apply to the mechanism of natural selection. We take each element of mechanistic explanation in turn. Having appreciated the importance of functional individuation, we show how decomposition and organization should be better understood in these terms. We thereby show that mechanistic explanation by protein synthesis and natural selection are more closely analogous than they appear—both possess all three of these core elements of a mechanism widely recognized in the mechanisms literature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-291
Number of pages13
JournalStudies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Function and Organization: Comparing the mechanisms of protein synthesis and natural selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this