Gender affects naming latencies for living and nonliving things: implications for familiarity

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    76 Citations (Scopus)
    31 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Recent studies indicate the presence of a gender-by-category interaction in the naming abilities of both Alzheimer's patients and normal subjects (Laiacona, Barbarotto and Capitani, 1998; McKenna and Parry, 1994). In particular, males appear to be better than females at naming nonliving things and females better at naming living things. Similarly, in a recent study of semantic fluency, males retrieved more names of tools than females and females more names of fruit than males (Capitani, Laiacona and Barbarotto, 1999). Such findings have important implications for our understanding of category-specific disorders. The current study examined the naming latencies of normal subjects to pictures of living and nonliving things. We confirm a gender-by category interaction across both subject and item, with females being slower than males to name nonliving things and males slower to name living things. This finding could not be explained by differential difficulty of items or differences in gender-based familiarity ratings.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)729-733
    JournalCortex
    Volume35
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - 1999

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Gender affects naming latencies for living and nonliving things: implications for familiarity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this