TY - JOUR
T1 - Grammar resources for modelling dialogue dynamically
AU - Gargett, Andrew
AU - Gregoromichelaki, Eleni
AU - Kempson, Ruth
AU - Purver, Matthew
AU - Sato, Yo
N1 - “The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com”. Copyright Springer
PY - 2009/12
Y1 - 2009/12
N2 - This paper argues that by analysing language as a mechanism for growth of information (Cann et al. in The Dynamics of Language, Elsevier, Oxford, 2005; Kempson et al. in Dynamic Syntax, Blackwell, Oxford, 2001), not only does a unitary basis for ellipsis become possible, otherwise thought to be irredeemably heterogeneous, but also a whole range of sub-types of ellipsis, otherwise thought to be unique to dialogue, emerge as natural consequences of use of language in context. Dialogue fragment types modelled include reformulations, clarification requests, extensions, and acknowledgements. Buttressing this analysis, we show how incremental use of fragments serves to progressively narrow down the otherwise mushrooming interpretational alternatives in language use, and hence is central to fluent conversational interaction. We conclude that, by its ability to reflect dialogue dynamics as a core phenomenon of language use, a grammar with inbuilt parsing dynamics opens up the potential for analysing language as a mechanism for communicative interaction.
AB - This paper argues that by analysing language as a mechanism for growth of information (Cann et al. in The Dynamics of Language, Elsevier, Oxford, 2005; Kempson et al. in Dynamic Syntax, Blackwell, Oxford, 2001), not only does a unitary basis for ellipsis become possible, otherwise thought to be irredeemably heterogeneous, but also a whole range of sub-types of ellipsis, otherwise thought to be unique to dialogue, emerge as natural consequences of use of language in context. Dialogue fragment types modelled include reformulations, clarification requests, extensions, and acknowledgements. Buttressing this analysis, we show how incremental use of fragments serves to progressively narrow down the otherwise mushrooming interpretational alternatives in language use, and hence is central to fluent conversational interaction. We conclude that, by its ability to reflect dialogue dynamics as a core phenomenon of language use, a grammar with inbuilt parsing dynamics opens up the potential for analysing language as a mechanism for communicative interaction.
KW - Natural language processing
KW - Incrementality
KW - Syntax
KW - Semantics
KW - Pragmatics
KW - Context
KW - Dialogue modelling
KW - Ellipsis
U2 - 10.1007/s11571-009-9088-y
DO - 10.1007/s11571-009-9088-y
M3 - Article
SN - 1871-4080
VL - 3
SP - 347
EP - 363
JO - Cognitive Neurodynamics
JF - Cognitive Neurodynamics
IS - 4
ER -