Abstract
This paper examines the way in which concepts of a low-level classificatory kind occur in different kinds of experiences, and what happens when subjects of deceptive musical hallucinations re-assess their experiences and come to realise that they are hallucinating.
Drawing upon this account, it is shown how it is possible for subjects to adopt different conceptual stances with respect to veridical perceptual experience. The issue of the seeming “transparency” of perceptual experience is explored, and it is argued that the sense in which perceptual experience is transparent is compatible with the Critical Realist version of the causal theory of perception: hallucinatory phenomena show how perception can be intentionally direct, yet causally mediated. Transparency does not provide any special support for Direct Realist or Disjunctivist theories of perception.
Drawing upon this account, it is shown how it is possible for subjects to adopt different conceptual stances with respect to veridical perceptual experience. The issue of the seeming “transparency” of perceptual experience is explored, and it is argued that the sense in which perceptual experience is transparent is compatible with the Critical Realist version of the causal theory of perception: hallucinatory phenomena show how perception can be intentionally direct, yet causally mediated. Transparency does not provide any special support for Direct Realist or Disjunctivist theories of perception.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Hallucination |
Subtitle of host publication | Philosophy and Psychology |
Editors | F. Macpherson, D. Platchais |
Place of Publication | Cambridge: Mass |
Publisher | MIT Press |
Pages | 381-398 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780262019200 |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2013 |
Keywords
- Perceptual experience; transparency; hallucination; causal theory of perception; critical realism; direct realism; disjunctivism.