How long should a diary be kept? A diary study of prospective and retrospective memory errors in young and old healthy adults

Andrew Laughland, Lia Kvavilashvili

Research output: Contribution to conferencePosterpeer-review

279 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Memory research has commonly been conducted in the laboratory, and by the use of self-report questionnaires assessing retrospective and prospective memory. Although a diary method can give more accurate insight into everyday memory processes, there are very few diary studies of everyday memory errors. This study added a 28-day diary-recording period to laboratory tests and self-assessment questionnaires. The 28 day period was expected to cover different aspects of life – busier and quieter periods – but initial results showed that surprisingly few memory errors were recorded over a 28 day period, yet participants claimed to have been recording the majority of memory errors experienced during this period. We suspect that participants fatigue over 28 days or start slowly because they feel they have plenty of time, and therefore record fewer errors. A second 7-day diary condition was added and results will compare the number of memory errors committed pro rata over the two diary-keeping periods.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - May 2014
Event4th International Conference on Prospective Memory - Naples, Italy
Duration: 26 May 201430 May 2014

Conference

Conference4th International Conference on Prospective Memory
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityNaples
Period26/05/1430/05/14

Keywords

  • diary study, study design, young adults, older adults, prospective memory, retrospective memory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How long should a diary be kept? A diary study of prospective and retrospective memory errors in young and old healthy adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this