How to Code the Meaning of the Child Interview

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

    Abstract

    Chapter 7 describes the analytical process of classifying the Meaning of the Child Interview (MotC), drawing upon previous chapters. Essential features of the discourse, identified by the system, are outlined through brief descriptions. Coding the MotC is a skill, and like any useful skill, needs to be taught and practiced. This account, however, should support those who want to understand the principles behind the assessment and use them to inform their clinical practice, while offering a useful summary to those learning the method.
    Coding can be seen as a 5-stage process:
    1. Reading and Familiarisation
    2. Detailed Annotation of Key Features of the Text
    3. Global and Functional Theorisation
    4. Consideration of Exemplars
    5. Pulling Together a Final Classification
    This process is circular and interactive, moving between the global picture and detailed evidence until a theory has been developed that best fits all available evidence. Classifications offer a main pattern, as well as the level of parent-child synchrony. The MotC is an assessment of the nature of a relationship rather than a measurement: even collaborative relationships can be problematic in some circumstances. Nonetheless, the classification is useful to gauge concern, and tailor support to the needs of the family.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Meaning of the Child Interview: Making Sense of Parent-Child Relationships
    EditorsBen Grey
    PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
    Chapter7
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Jan 2026

    Keywords

    • meaning of the child interview, attachment theory, attachment, caregiving, parenting, parent-child relationships, adult attachment interview, parent development interview, assessment

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How to Code the Meaning of the Child Interview'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this