‘I don't know much about art, but I know what I like’: Resonance, relevance and illumination as assessment criteria for marketing research and scholarship

Sue Halliday

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Questions the processes and methodologies of marketing research. Challenges the “scientific” hypothetico-deductive approach and asserts that interpretative and qualitative methods provide a more worthwhile framework for research. Explores frames of reference for assessing qualitative marketing scholarship and research. Discusses the implications of adapting frameworks from the world of art. Concludes by stressing that marketing research needs to be accepted at different levels of focus; hard work is required to create resonance; and persuasiveness and illumination should be of supreme importance in the research design and data analysis.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)354-362
    Number of pages9
    JournalMarketing Intelligence and Planning
    Volume17
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1999

    Keywords

    • art
    • marketing research
    • marketing theory
    • methodology
    • postmodernism
    • qualitative techniques

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '‘I don't know much about art, but I know what I like’: Resonance, relevance and illumination as assessment criteria for marketing research and scholarship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this