Abstract
I clarify recently developed phenomenological approaches to social cognition.
These are approaches that, drawing on developmental science, social neuroscience,
and dynamic systems theory, emphasize the involvement of embodied and enactive
processes together with communicative and narrative practices in contexts of intersubjective understanding. I review some of the evidence that supports these approaches. I consider a variety of criticisms leveled against them, and defend the role of phenomenology in the explanation of social cognition. Finally, I show how these phenomenological approaches can solve the “starting problem” of social cognition.
These are approaches that, drawing on developmental science, social neuroscience,
and dynamic systems theory, emphasize the involvement of embodied and enactive
processes together with communicative and narrative practices in contexts of intersubjective understanding. I review some of the evidence that supports these approaches. I consider a variety of criticisms leveled against them, and defend the role of phenomenology in the explanation of social cognition. Finally, I show how these phenomenological approaches can solve the “starting problem” of social cognition.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 187-212 |
Journal | Review of Philosophy and Psychology |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 23 Dec 2011 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- social cognition
- phenomenology
- theory theory
- simulation theory
- false-belief tests
- starting problem