In search of general evolutionary principles: why Darwinism is too important to be left to the biologists

Geoffrey Hodgson, T. Knudsen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    27 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Bioeconomics emphasizes the common ontological ground between economics and biology. However, this does not necessarily mean that both disciplines collapse into one. Instead it is proposed here that Darwinism provides a general, meta-theoretical framework for dealing with complex evolving systems, consisting of populations of varied and replicating entities, which are found in both nature and human society. There is no alternative to the core Darwinian principles of variation, selection and inheritance to explain the evolution of such systems. Neither the actual existence of human intentionality, nor the hypothetical existence of Lamarckian processes of acquired character inheritance, offer a barrier to the use of Darwinian explanations. However, while Darwinian principles are always necessary to explain complex evolving population systems, they are never sufficient on their own. Such a generalized Darwinism can accommodate several different stances found in the literature on bioeconomics and elsewhere.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)51-69
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Bioeconomics
    Volume10
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Keywords

    • bioeconomics
    • generalized Darwinism
    • complex systems
    • intentionality

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'In search of general evolutionary principles: why Darwinism is too important to be left to the biologists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this