Interacting? Yes: But of what kind and on what basis?

D. Hutto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)


De Jaegher’s (2009) paper argues that Gallagher, who aims to replace traditional theory-of-mind accounts of social understanding with accounts based on direct perception (hereafter DP), has missed an important opportunity. Despite a desire to break faith with tradition, there is a danger that proponents of DP accounts will remain (at least tacitly) committed to an unchallenged, and perhaps unnoticed, sort of individualism inherent in traditional theories (i.e. those that regard our engagement with others as a ‘problem’ to be solved: a problem of other minds). Taking a more root and branch approach, De Jaegher recommends a complete shift of focus. She proposes that a more thoroughgoing and fruitful response to traditional approaches must attend to, and seek to understand, interactional phenomena proper—for it is the nature of interactions themselves that importantly influence individuals. Hence, it is the processes of interacting which ‘span individuals’ and their specific, dynamic evolution over time that should take pride of place in research into social cognition
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)543-546
JournalConsciousness and cognition
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2009


Dive into the research topics of 'Interacting? Yes: But of what kind and on what basis?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this