International Consensus Statement on Platelet Function and Genetic Testing in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 2024 Update

Dominick J. Angiolillo, Mattia Galli, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Daniel Aradi, Deepak L. Bhatt, Laurent Bonello, Davide Capodanno, Larisa H. Cavallari, Jean-Philippe Collet, Thomas Cuisset, Jose Luis Ferreiro, Francesco Franchi, Tobias Geisler, C. Michael Gibson, Diana A. Gorog, Paul A. Gurbel, Young-Hoon Jeong, Rossella Marcucci, Jolanta M. Siller-Matula, Roxana MehranFranz-Josef Neumann, Naveen L. Pereira, Konstantinos D. Rizas, Fabiana Rollini, Derek Y.F. So, Gregg W. Stone, Robert F. Storey, Udaya S. Tantry, Jurrien Ten Berg, Dietmar Trenk, Marco Valgimigli, Ron Waksman, Dirk Sibbing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Current evidence indicates that dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor is essential for the prevention of thrombotic events after percutaneous coronary interventions. However, dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with increased bleeding which may outweigh the benefits. This has set the foundations for customizing antiplatelet treatments to the individual patient. However, bleeding and ischemic risks are often present in the same patient, making it difficult to achieve this balance. The fact that oral P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor) have diverse pharmacodynamic profiles that affect clinical outcomes supports the rationale for using platelet function and genetic testing to individualize antiplatelet treatment regimens. Indeed, up to one-third of patients treated with clopidogrel, but a minority of those treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor, exhibit high residual platelet reactivity resulting in an increased thrombotic risk. On the other hand, prasugrel and ticagrelor are frequently associated with low platelet reactivity and increased bleeding risk compared with clopidogrel without providing any additional reduction in ischemic events compared with patients who adequately respond to clopidogrel. The use of platelet function and genetic testing may allow for a guided selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitors. However, the nonuniform results of randomized controlled trials have led guidelines to provide limited recommendations on the implementation of these tests in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In light of recent advancements in the field, this consensus document by a panel of international experts fills in the guideline gap by providing updates on the latest evidence in the field as well as recommendations for clinical practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2639-2663
Number of pages25
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume17
Issue number22
Early online date25 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Nov 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Consensus Statement on Platelet Function and Genetic Testing in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 2024 Update'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this