It Takes More than Moore to Answer Existence-Questions

Karl Egerton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Several recent discussions of metaphysics disavow existence-questions, claiming that they are metaphysically uninteresting because trivially settled in the affirmative by Moorean facts. This is often given as a reason to focus metaphysical debate instead on questions of grounding. I argue that the strategy employed to undermine existence-questions fails against its usual target: Quineanism. The Quinean can protest that the formulation given of their position is a straw man: properly understood, as a project of explication, Quinean metaphysics does not counsel us to choose between obvious ordinary-language claims and absurd revisionist claims, even if appeal to Moorean facts is permitted.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages22
JournalErkenntnis
Early online date18 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'It Takes More than Moore to Answer Existence-Questions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this