Abstract
In this paper, I express continued support for localist modelling in psychology and critically evaluate previous studies that have sought to weaken the localist case in favour of models with thoroughgoing distributed representation. I question claims that information measures and sparseness indices derived from single-cell recording data are supportive of distributed representation and show that the patterns observed in those data can be reproduced from simulations of a model that is known to be localist. I also set out some logical objections to the complementary learning hypothesis, particularly in as much as it is used to justify thoroughgoing-distributed models of the cortex.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 366-379 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Language, Cognition and Neuroscience |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 17 Nov 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Mar 2017 |
Keywords
- localist models; sparseness; information theory; complementary learning hypothesis